Reexamining Gender Concerns
Relating to Elisabeth Horst, Erik Erikson's hypotheses pertaining to personality and intimacy disconcerns sex differences. The main consensus of several authors concludes that Erikson thinks that women depend on marriage to build up their identification. This was created at a time the moment differences in genders were cured as afterthoughts. He based his hypotheses on the assertive version of experience. Yet Erikson did not portray girls as second-rate. There seems to be considered a conflict in underemphasizing can certainly roles and overemphasizing can certainly roles and overemphasizing their job in the social system. Very little was revealed women on this time. One creator (Marcia, 1980) implicated that intimacy turns into more of a female task and identity illustrates a masculine task. Orlosfsky (1977) describes the manly traits just like independence, autonomy, and assertiveness even more important to forming identification than the more feminine qualities of warmth, pain, and understanding. Some freelance writers disagree with Erikson's theory of human development mainly because they considered him to be a sexist. His writings engaged the assertive aspect more than the feminine part in his studies. Horst, Electronic. A. (1995). Reexamining Male or female Issues in Erikson's Stages of Identification and Closeness. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73 (3), 271-278. Marcia, T. (1980). Identity in Adolescence. In M. Adelson (Ed. ), Handbook of Young Psychology. Ny. Wiley.
Division and Attachments
Various feminist critize Erik Erikson's theory because of neglect or perhaps misprotrayal of female encounter. He seems to presume that identity precedes intimacy. This kind of seems to add limitations to his general theory of human creation. Even though this individual includes trust, autonomy, motivation, industry, personality, intimacy, generativity, and ethics into his theories. Erikson demonstrates the stages of life as: (I) Childhood showing trust vs doubtfulness ages 0-16...