Friends and family group webinar in a child welfare framework вЂ“ A review of the books
Family group conferencing within a child welfare context
Doctor Leone Huntsman
Hub for Raising a child & Analysis Research, Financing & Organization Analysis Section NSW Section of Community Services 4-6 Cavill Opportunity Ashfield NSW 2131 Cellphone (02) 9716 2222 July 2006
ISBN 1 74190 0107
1 . Introduction1
1 . 1What is family group conferencing? 1
1 . 2Aim and range of this review1
2 . The family group conferencing model2
2 . 1History2
2 . 2The basic model2
2 . 3Variations on the fundamental model3
a few. Key themes in the literature5
3. 1Suitability of friends and family group conferencing5
Types of cases suited to FGC your five Suitability to get culturally different and native communities6 3. 2Roles and attitudes of participants7
Children and young people9
several. 3Outcomes and long-term effects11
Agreeing as well as implementing plans11
Placement of kids and young adults with prolonged family12 Recurring reporting and re-referral12
three or more. 4Overall efficiency of family members group conferencing13
Lack of analysis evidence14
4. Implications to get child safety policy and practice15
Statutory responsibilities of child protection agencies15
Family behaviour to kid protection agencies15
A mandate to get FGC? 18
A systemic approach to FGC17
5. Ideas for future research18
my spouse and i
Relatives group webinar (FGC) is known as a method of managing, or seeking to resolve, relatives issues in relation to child safeguard. It brings together the family members, the child and professionals to fulfill and build a plan for upcoming action. FGC began in New Zealand in the late 1980s, growing away of Maori cultural practice, and propagate to many countries across the world through the 1990s. Their use in Sydney is now lawfully supported in numerous states, nonetheless it has not become a part of mainstream practice between most kid protection companies. Review of the literature
After a basic explanation of the basic FGC model and some of it is variants, this kind of review discusses the considerable body of literature on FGC that has developed considering that the early 1990s. The aim of the review is usually to synthesise the available literature with a view to commenting on its work with by child protection regulators in New South Wales, and to measure the need for further more research in this field. Several major aspects of study will be outlined in the review:
1 . Appropriateness of FGC. Some studies examine the types of cases that are suitable for recommendation to FGC. For example , use of FGC sometimes involving sex abuse has become found simply by some to work well. Other studies include examined the suitability of FGC pertaining to Indigenous and also other communities. It was found that some Native communities in Australian include responded well but that considerable basic work is required if great outcomes are to be achieved. 2 . Roles and attitudes of participants. Three sets of participants in FGC are the family, the child or young person and child protection specialists. Studies possess found that family members generally have a positive response to FGC, and professionals also truly feel positively towards it but are often not satisfied with its longer-term outcomes. A few researchers dread, however , that children are unsatisfied with their position in FGC and are not really sufficiently central to the process. 3. Final results and long-term effects. During your stay on island is a insufficient reliable long term studies on FGC, some consistent items are elevated in the books: while having a plan of action at a conference can be quite a successful procedure, implementation of plans is much less so; FGC tends to result in increased keeping of children with extended family members, and that this sort of...
References: Adams, P. (2002). Interweaving formal and informal care: the truth of relatives group meeting. Social Development Issues, 23, 3, 36-42.
Adams, P., & Chandler, S i9000
Adams, P., & Chandler, S, M. (2004). Reactive regulation in child wellbeing: Systemic issues to mainstreaming the family group seminar. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 31, you, 93-116.
Adams, S., & Krauth, K
Beecher, R., Funds, M., & Graham, A. (2000). Do Children Include a Voice in Family members Group Conferences? Sheffield, UK, University of Sheffield.
Brown, L. (2003). Popular or margin? The current make use of family group conferences in child well being practice in the united kingdom. Child and Family Interpersonal Work, 8, 331-340.
Burford, G., & Pennell, J
Clarkson, J., & Frank, J. (2000). The voice with the child, in C. Lupton, (Ed. ), Moving Forward in Family Group Conferences in Hampshire: Advancements in Analysis and Practice (pp. 77-88), Portsmouth, UK, University of Portsmouth.
Crampton, M. (2000). Does the type of kid maltreatment matter in friends and family group decision making? 2000 FGDM Roundtable Procedures, retrieved from your American Gentle Association site.
Crampton, D. S. (2004). Family members involvement affluence in kid protection: Learning from contextual integrated strategies, Journal of Sociology and Cultural Welfare, thirty-one, 1, 175-198.
Cunneen, C., and Libesman, Big t
Dalrymple, M. (1997). Testimonials of Friends and family Group Meetings: Messages coming from UK Exploration and Practice and Family Group Conferences: An Preliminary Pack, in Child Misuse Review, six, 235-236.
DePanfilis, M. (2000). How do I develop a supporting alliance with all the family? In H. Dubowitz & Deb. DePanfilis (Eds. ), Handbook for Kid Protection Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA, UNITED STATES: Sage, 36-40.
DePanfilis, D. & Zuravin, S. J. (2002). The effect of services for the recurrence of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(2), 187-205
Gill, L., Higginson, T., & Napier, H. (2003). Family group conferences in permanency organizing, Adoption & Fostering, 72, 2, 53-63.
Kiely, P (2002) A Longitudinal evaluation of family group conferencing, a paper shown at the Aussie Council of Welfare Agencies (ACWA) Conference.
Konzis, M., & Lowin, A. (1998). Day care outcomes: monetary perspectives and issues, Kids and Contemporary society, 12, 169-179.
LeCroy & Milligan Associates
Levine, M. (2000). The family group convention in the New Zealand Children, Young Individuals, and Their Families Act of 1989 (CYP& F): Assessment and Analysis, Behavioral Sciences and the Legislation, 18, 517-556.
Lupton, C., & Nixon, G
Lupton, C., Barnard, S i9000., & Swall-Yarrington, M. (1995). Family Planning? An Evaluation from the Family Group Conference Unit. Portsmouth, UK: SSRIU, University or college of Portsmouth.
Mandell, D., Sullivan, N., & Meredith, G
Marsh, G., & Crow, G. (1998). Family Group Conferences in Child Wellbeing, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific research.
McCallum, S. (2000). Review of the Port Augusta Aboriginal Family members Project.
McCurdky, K., Hurvis, S., & Clark simon, J. (1996). Engaging and retaining family members in child abuse avoidance programs, The APSAC Expert, 9(3), 1-9.
McDonald, T., & Johnson, W. (1992). Guessing recurrence of maltreatment pertaining to child lovemaking abuse cases, in
Merkel-Holguin, L., Nixon, P., & Burford, G. (2003). Learning with households: A synopsis of FGDM Research and Evaluation in Child Well being, Protecting Kids, 18, 1 & installment payments on your
Pennell, J. (2004). Should his and her matching sides from the family become invited to the FGC? American Humane: FGDM Issues in Brief, www.americanhumane.org.
Pennell, L., & Burford, G
Pennell, J., & Burford, G. (1999). Relatives group making decisions: After the meeting вЂ“ improvement in fixing violence and promoting health and wellness: Outcome Survey Summary. Englewood, CO, UNITED STATES, American Humane Association.
Pennell, J, & Burford, G
Rasmussen, B. Meters. (2001). A decision making style вЂplus' вЂ“ the study of the Danish Try out Family Group Conferencing, www.americanhumane.org.
Father christmas Clara Region FCM. (2002). Executive Synopsis. Family Conference Institute. www.americanhumane.org.
Sundell, K. (2000). The Swedish Family Group Conference Examine: www.americanhumane.org.
Sundell, T., Vinnerljung, N., & Ryburn, M
Sundell, K. & Vinnerljung, B. (2004). Outcomes of relatives group conferencing in Sweden: A 3-year follow-up. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 267-287.
Thoennes, N. (2003). Friends and family group making decisions in Colarado, Protecting kids вЂ“ guaranteeing results, potential new directions: International FGDM Research and Evaluation in Child Wellbeing, 18, .5.
Marcher, C., Sheehan, R., Liddell, M., & Laragy, C
Vesneski, Watts. (1998). Analysis of Washington State's Friends and family Group Meeting Pilot Job. Unpublished statement, Northwest Start for Children and Families, School of Buenos aires.
Waites, C., Macgowan, M
Walton, E., Roby, J., Frandsen, A., & Davidson, L. (2003). Conditioning at-risk people by relating to the extended relatives. Journal of Family Interpersonal Work, 7(4), 1-21.